Well, heck y'all, I just don't see any particular problem with the concept of joiner fields. It has never let me down with any of my commercial apps using VFP. If y'all iz havin problems using them, howz about just calling that dude and seein if he would sell you some consulting time!
No, don't y'all be feeling bad about not understandin tham joiner fields. Even I get stuck sometimes. You see, now that I am beginning to migrate some of my back end tables to PostgreSQL I am having a real problem cuz there is no info on them thar joiner fields. I am gonna have to figure a new way of settin up joiners. Anyone out there have any "pointers" <g> for me on that stuff for PostgreSQL? heh-heh... joiner fields. The crazy thing is that had I heard this guy years ago when learning dBase and FoxBase/Pro I may have actually begun to use that term myself. It is pretty descriptive. Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Bourke > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Idiots are everywhere > > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:35:56 -0600, "Whil Hentzen (Pro*)" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > "joiner fields" > > That's so crazy it just might work! > -- > Alan Bourke > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
