John,
Try right clicking on the dbc name in the data tab of the project manager
and look at the Include/exclude property. I guess you have included the dbc
in your executable.

Either that or you have a corrupted dbc, but the compiler doesn't look at
the dbc so it shouldn't be that. Also run a "validate" on the database

Dave Crozier



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John J. Mihaljevic
Sent: 09 January 2007 16:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: Strange error message

Hi all,

When building an EXE from my project, I'm getting two errors.  Here's the
.ERR file:

        Compiling c:\pontotoc\pontotoc.dbc
        dondondonENDIF it's locked already, or i was able to lock it
        Error in line 36 (record 3): Unrecognized command verb.
        Error in line 40 (record 3): An IF | ELSE | ENDIF statement is
missing.

I've got no clue what "dondondon" could be, or in which form it's finding
the two errors that are listed.  Normally, whenever I get an error, it tells
me which form, etc., but not here.  And I've never seen an error generated
from compiling the .DBC.

Any suggestions for how to track these down and correct them?

Thanks much!

John
"The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of
strength, not a lack of knowledge, but lack of will." - Vince Lombardi

* All mail scanned by Norton AntiVirus.  No AV software on your computer?
Remove me from your address book, please.

* Please respect my privacy.  Do not forward my address to anyone else or
include me in emails sent to multiple recipients.  Use BCC.



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to