On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:27 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
>> More interesting as to whether or not they'll be able to keep
>> calling it
>> the iphone.
>
> I give up....why wouldn't they be allowed to continue calling it?
Cisco owns the trademark to 'iPhone'. Apple had been in negotiations
with them to be allowed to use the name, but they didn't come to an
agreement before MacWorld. Jobs went ahead and announced the name as
'iPhone' anyway.
Now the lawyers will duke it out. I'd bet that, based on the initial
reaction to the iPhone (have you seen Apple's stock price these last
two days?), Cisco will be demanding much more than they could have
before the announcment.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
