John Weller wrote:
> I have been asked to help a local charity.  They are replacing their
> existing network (Win 98) with four machines which will be networked as a
> peer-to-peer workgroup.  They will not be doing anything fancy, just normal
> office type work; accounts (Sage), word processing, etc.  The requirement
> has gone out to tender without a detailed spec and with a request for the
> suppliers to recommend a suitable system.  They are getting some responses
> specifying XP Home and others XP Pro.  I know that XP Home has some
> limitations compared with Pro, for instance it cannot join a domain.  Are
> there any other limitations which would impact them?  I'd be grateful for
> any comments.
> 
> I've suggested that they use Open Office rather than pay M$ for 4 Office
> licences but am getting some resistance from people who have never heard of
> it (not users incidentally but committee members who will have to approve
> the purchase).  Are there any limitations of Open Office compared to M$
> Office?  I've not found any but, again, would be grateful for comments from
> anyone who has more experience of OO.

I edited FoxTalk for three years using OOo, exchanging documents in DOC 
format with my layout person at Pinnacle as well as with each author, 
using revisions extensively. No one ever noticed.

We produced every book since 2001 using OOo as well, exchanging files 
with authors, editors and layout folks. I would sometimes use OOo on 
Windows, sometimes on Linux. Except for some problems with bullets and 
numbered lists the first year or two, no problems. Nowadays, our books 
go straight from OOo to PDF to the printer. We don't print galleys for 
the printer - they take our files electronically. Again, no one knows 
the difference.

My kids all use OOo for a variety of school projects, word processing, 
spreadsheet, presentations... exchanging documents with teachers and 
peers is seamless.

If your users have extensive macros in existing spreadsheets, you will 
have a problem using those worksheets in OOo. That's the only caveat I 
can think of.

Whil


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to