Whats wrong with that ?
I sure as hell wouldn’t lie for them either. 

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jeff Fisher
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 1:40 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [NF] Ethics again

One of my clients wanted me to fill out an insurance report for 'water
damage' on her computer equipment [it's a small office - 3 computers]. I
stopped by the other day to fix up her network again [she plugged the
telephone line into her router instead of the CAT 5 - two people in two days
that did that!!] and take a look at her equipment so I could sign a paper
stating that it was damaged.  First warning sign, she was telling me that
her computer and printer was just a year old - the same stuff that I worked
with 3 years ago when it was then a year old. Three computers [a 4 year old
'1 year old' 1.8 GHz desktop, a two year old '1 year old' laptop, a brand
new laptop that was at her house at the time], two printers [both I worked
on 3 years ago], a router that I 'fixed' by plugging the correct line in,
and some other stuff. 

 

Just sent her a letter telling her that I couldn't do it and I know that I
have already lost hundreds on current invoices because of it and lose her as
a future client but I just couldn't do it.

 

Damn these ethics - it is costing me money again.

 

jeff fisher, MCP

www.turbofish.com

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to