> The consultant/ISV wants to give his client the best
> solution for his money and help him get a good ROI so that the client
> trusts him and uses him again.

Then again, I have seen the results of "consultants" who have basically
pissed away a large amount of client capital (after getting their cut of
course) chasing the Next Big Thing because it sounded cool, and M$ was so
behind the Next Big Thing (Oracle too, and IBM, and even Novell at times).
So, rather than strive to do a good, qaulity job, they hit and run with
dazzling claims, then leave the likes of Ed (even myself to a far lesser
degree, as I do not like mopping up after someone else's mess when all the
capital is already gone <g>) to clean up the problems.  The "consultant" is
off to their next victim, and who is the wiser?  Do you think he/she is
going to give their previous screwup as a reference?  No, they duck behind
the NDA Shield and claim "I'd love to tell you, but has to remain
confidential..."  Those that speak loudest, and beat their chests hardest,
often have the most to hide and need to make a big sound to cover up their
inadequacies.  Me, I lurk quietly in the background and offer my opinion
when it seems warranted.  If a prospect feels compelled to follow someone
else's recommendation with Candyland Technology with the Acronymn Of The Day
terminology, then let the lemmings run.  I prefer to work with folks who
want reasonable, highly cost effective solutions that return excellent
results to maximize their ability to leverage their technology investment
for their business advantage.  These kinds of solid clients let those
competitors that fall prey to the Loud Voices burn off their capital in
nonsensical ways.  In short, I guess the My Evil Other Self kind of likes
the victimizer consultants, makes things better for me in a way.

Gil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Daylight Saving Time, automated Time Synch
>
>
> Stephen the Cook wrote:
> > So as long as it's not a WIN os it's fine?  From my POV the Data Ho just
> > does it.  They don't care anymore how it's done.  Just that the work is
> > completed.  It's just characters and numbers to me.  It has
> nothing to do
> > anything past that.  Sorry.
> >
>
> But see....both are right, each from a different perspective:  the
> employee just does the job, and is glad to be employed and doesn't
> really care about the big financial picture--he just does the job and
> gets his pay.  The consultant/ISV wants to give his client the best
> solution for his money and help him get a good ROI so that the client
> trusts him and uses him again.
>
> --
> Michael J. Babcock, MCP
> MB Software Solutions, LLC
> http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> http://fabmate.com
> "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to