Have you looked at West-Wind Web Connection?  It sounds like it fits
your need perfectly.  As much as VFP really could and it has been battle
tested for years.

* It has scripting support built in.
* In COM mode, it self monitors the COM objects and would kill any that
have hung up.
* It runs optimally with two COM instances per CPU in the server.  (2
CPU server = 4 COM instances)
* Those 4 COM instances could service thousands and thousands of hits
per hour.

You'd be up and running in a matter of days.  Are you sure that you're
not over-engineering your business need?

-Kevin
CULLY Technologies, LLC

Sponsor of FoxForward 2007
foxforward.net


Nick wrote:
> No real alternative here, definitely needs multithreading to do this task
> properly.
> 
> The task at hand is a Multithreaded HTTP Webserver written entirely in Fox.
> The idea being that each Virtual Directory would have it's own executable
> (maybe multiple) to marshall the traffic for it's own requests to the
> Winsock layer.  That way if the owner of one particular Virtual directory
> wrote code that locked-up the exe it would only be their own exe that would
> stop working all others would still be running.
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>> Of Paul Hill
>> Sent: 20 March 2007 17:32
>> To: ProFox Email List
>> Subject: Re: Multithreading - what is the latest
>>
>> On 3/20/07, Nick Causton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Can anyone update me with the latest on multithreading VFP?
>> IMHO it's a hack in VFP at best (similar hacks were available in VB6).
>>
>> Maybe you could explain what you're trying to achieve.  Sometimes a
>> non-multithreaded approach works equally well.
>>
>> --
>> Paul
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to