On Mar 22, 2007, at 5:45 PM, David Crooks wrote:
> -- In what can safely be termed a total departure from the
> definition of
> resignation, Dubya explains the firing of 8 U.S. Attorneys by the
> Attorney General. White House, Mar. 20, 2007
And, of course, the Attorney General testified before Congress that
there was no political motivations behind the firings, just before
the email records showed that exactly the opposite was true. So if it
wasn't the blowjob, it was the lying under oath that Clinton was
impeached for, then I guess it wasn't the firings, but the lying
under oath that Gonzalez should be charged with.
I guess I can see why they don't want anyone else to testify under
oath. They'd actually have to consider telling the truth for once.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
