> The operative points here, I think, are that VFP is very, very good at > what it does; that .NET is not a suitable replacement; that the > royalty-free standard for this type of language/product is a stake in > the ground that MS will never remove, and that not only is there a > market for VFP, but a growing one.
Bill, when will you pull your head out of the sand and realize the market for VFP is shrinking, not growing? Just because you want it to grow, and just because the people that could benefit from VFP apps may grow, it doesn't mean the use of VFP is or will grow. -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
