I want to know this problems.
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Send ProFox mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ProFox digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [OT] McCain - hacked (Adam Buckland) > 2. Re: [NF] MAME/pinMAME (was Re: [NF] What do you buy...) > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 3. [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles (mrgmhale) > 4. [NF] Book list from the Reg for C# titles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 5. RE: Multithreading - what is the latest (Nick) > 6. Re: Foxpro going opensource (Derek Kalweit) > 7. Re: [OT] More global warming (Nicholas Geti) > 8. Re: [OT] More global warming (Nicholas Geti) > 9. Re: [OT] More global warming (Vince Teachout) > 10. RE: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles (Darcy Whyte) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Adam Buckland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:45:28 +0100 > Subject: [OT] McCain - hacked > http://mike.newsvine.com/_news/2007/03/26/633799-hacking-john-mccain > > > > Arf! > > > > ::a > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:46:38 -0400 > Subject: Re: [NF] MAME/pinMAME (was Re: [NF] What do you buy...) > Hi Steve, > > >From what I understand with the new artwork system (introduced in .107) > not only can the art be layered (bezel, backdrop, overlay, etc.) and > hi-res but "lamps" can also be set up. Like with Gorf where your "space > rank" lights up. I was thinking that you could combine hi-res backglass > art with the DMD displays and maybe have the lamps blinking behind it > where appropriate. I know it would take a monumental effort to move to the > latest source but it sure would be nice to look at. Please see my post > here on the mameworld forum. > > > http://www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=artwork&Number=92054&Forum=All_Forums&Words=pinmame&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=92054&Search=true#Post92054 > > You can see the new artwork at Mr. Do's page. At the bottom is a grid > showing games where hi-res art has been created and which games have lamps > and/or LEDs set up. In the views column click a link to see sample > screenshots. > > http://www.mameworld.net/mrdo/mame_artwork.html > > > Regards, > > Andrew Baker > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Steve Ellenoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 03/27/2007 10:48 PM > Please respond to profox > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: [NF] MAME/pinMAME (was Re: [NF] What do you > buy...) > > > Thanks for the kind words Andrew - > > Glad you're enjoying those projects! They are a blast, and it's been > great to be/have been a part of them. We've got a nice update to > pinmame coming literally in a few days, though I don't see us moving > to the latest source from MAME anytime soon. We are way behind > versions at this point, and to bring the sources up to the latest > code would take a tremendous amount of effort which nobody seems to > have time nor desire to do. The biggest reason though, is probably > lack of a compelling reason to go through all the pain to do it. :) > > Having not played with the new artwork features of MAME recently, how > would you see that benefiting pinmame? (be specific) > If I can get someone (or myself) excited about the idea, perhaps we > could at least discuss moving to the latest source branch. > > Regards- > -Steve > > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "mrgmhale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:23:48 -0400 > Subject: [NF] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles > My SUV (2005 Suzuki XL-7, excellent vehicle, less than 19,000 miles on it) > gets about 17mpg around town, and 20mpg on the open highway. I am a > fairly > conservative driver. So (excluding increasing fuel prices over the next > 50+ > years) the Tesla, in my case, will not "pay for itself" by the time I am > about 125 years old. But, if I purchase a Tesla using funds acquired from > the rampant increase in housing values in SoCal (yes, the market will come > back, it always does) then what is it to me? The very idea of a > relatively > simple 70 pound electric motor being able to propel that vehicle as > efficiently (and quickly) as it does, as compared to a complex air-fuel > burning engine that weighs several hundred pounds, is very appealing to me > from a pure technical perspective. It would be like me riding around in > one > the the slot cars I used to have as a kid (my favorite was a Coke Bottle > Cheeta side-winder model), except a bit larger and far faster (and much > more > costly). > > The logic circuits to manage the distribution of electrical power must be > quite complex, and very interesting unto itself as well. I wonder what > kind > of specs can be uploaded from the machine's computer systems onto a > laptop. > Oooo00, I really am feeling the love here, folks! > > Gil > > > Depending on what you drive -- SUV at 10mpg - $2100/year -- only about > > 49 years and it's paid for :-) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chet Gardiner > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:11 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Energy efficient vehicles > > > > > > Depending on what you drive -- SUV at 10mpg - $2100/year -- only about > > 49 years and it's paid for :-) > > > > mrgmhale wrote: > > >> ?!?!? Wow....is that for real? > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Oh yes, it is for real. I just told Lynda I wold like to have > > one of them > > > puppies! I figure if I hold onto the California house for > > about another 5 > > > years I can cut it loose, then use a fraction of the proceeds > > to get me one > > > of them thar' 0-60mph in 4 seconds itty bitty monsters! My > > price for a 2008 > > > model with the options my heart desires comes in at $97,000, plus > State > > > Sales Tax of 8%, delivery charge, and out0of0area surcharge of another > > > $8,000. But look at how much I will save in not using gasoline for > the > > > 7,000 miles per year I drive on average! > > > > > > Gil > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software > Solutions > > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:52 PM > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: Re: Energy efficient vehicles > > >> > > >> > > >> Chet Gardiner wrote: > > >> > > >>> Cute. > > >>> > > >>> Here's a real energy efficient vehicle: > > >>> > > >>> http://www.teslamotors.com/index.php?js_enabled=1 > > >>> > > >>> > > >> ?!?!? Wow....is that for real? > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Michael J. Babcock, MCP > > >> MB Software Solutions, LLC > > >> http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com > > >> http://fabmate.com > > >> "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
