Michael,

Michael,

I concur with Derek's

http://siliconrealms.com/index.shtml

Craig Boyd (I believe) wrote an article on it in Visual Fox Advisor.  The
guy is bright and I trusted his judgment.  It is a pleasure to use and is
seamless.  They have more potential configurations that you could believe.
It gives me the feeling that I am getting ready to distribute shareware for
29.99 over the web and plan to do many thousand copies.

I use it wait special splash screen I post for a second - just so I can tell
I am running their code rather than the unprotected stuff.

When I bought it there was a trial version....

Carl Lindner






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 2:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Product license codes in your vertical apps


> How hard is it to stick in some mechanism whereby they plug in a license
> key you provide (or leave blank for the 'trial' version)?

You should probably invest in the industry standard for
shareware/trialware softare vendors:

http://siliconrealms.com/index.shtml

The standard Armadillo is what I use for
Overseer(http://www.overseer-network-monitor.com/). It's never been
cracked nor has anyone I know that uses Armadillo. It's feature rich,
and developing a similar system in house would likely be more
crack-prone and cost you more when you figure in what your time is
worth.

Before I started using Armadillo, I had a strong asynchronous
encryption method that worked fairly well, aside from complexity of
sending people the license files versus keys. That version of Overseer
was 'cracked' if you look on the crack sites, but all they did was
hack the assembly source to remove a few nag screens-- the product
wasn't fully functional(particularly the core part of it) with their
'crack'... ;-)


--
Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to