" Suzanne Spinelli, Middlebury, Connecticut I agree with the scientist in the report, however, why is it only Judeo/Christian creation myth that can be 'real.' There are many different creation myths from the past until the present. I think it is offensive to negate all those other myths for the "one true 'real'" myth (depending on one's point of view). After all, who is to say which one is right? Could it be that they are all right in their own way? "
To begin with there's a lot of evidence that Jesus Christ, as portrayed in the bible, is a myth. It seems that a lot of scholars, even in religious circles, are even not sure that the historical Jesus Christ did exist. Dr. Collins' reasoning that there's no conflict between science and faith is very weak. Myth and science don't mix. On 4/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/index.html> > > I liked the comments towards the bottom. > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
