On Apr 10, 2007, at 12:02 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Also, spouses who cheat should be
> held liable or at least not be allowed to collect anything in the
> divorce settlement.
I wouldn't restrict this to "cheating", which is breaking fidelity
by action. I would extend it to breaking fidelity by inaction.
Too much emphasis in this culture is placed on the prohibitive part
of the marriage vows. Everyone gets that the vows say you can't have
sex with anyone else, but they completely miss the proscriptive part,
which says that you *will* have sex with your partner; that you are
responsible for your partner's sexual satisfaction.
How many marriages do you know of after, say, the third year, where
the husband doesn't feel that his wife isn't keeping up her end of
the deal? How can that not build resentment? How can that ever be
good for a marriage?
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
