On 4/10/07, Robert Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment refox protects the majority of the foxpro's communities
> applications.

I dispute your claim. The vast majority of FoxPro's community
applications are "protected" by *honesty*. I suspect the vast majority
of files are unencrypted apps and FXPs, FRXs and so forth.

Licenses and copyright law provide a means of pursuing violations, but
at a cost.

I have one former customer who refused to continue paying annual
maintenance fees and insisted he could continue to use our software
without paying for it. Perhaps he is still using it. Poor sod. He has
no idea what he's missing.

If you really need to license your software, you could include some
binary-only licensing module, separate from your code. DRM doesn't
work, really. It never has. It's a polite lie, like door locks keep
out thieves. You could require some sort of check-in, you could expire
the code. People can patch around that code.

Perhaps you have some secret algorithm that needs protection. That's a
different case.

> At the end of the day is there a 'refox' equivalent for python that will
> give us quite a bit of protection from reverse engineering?

If you Google "Python obfuscation" you can find some leads.

I like Alex Martelli's summary: "the widespread and totally unfounded
belief in the worth of obfuscation is also damaging, but less so,
since it only steals some time and energy from developers who (if they
share this belief) can't be all that good anyway;-)."

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-November/350898.html

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to