On Tuesday 10 April 2007 6:01 pm, Derek Kalweit wrote: > > > Endorsing matrimony is respecting an establishment of religion. > > > > Oh, c'mon - that's just silly. Religions have prohibitions > > against murder and theft; if the government makes laws about those > > things, is that also violating the Establishment clause? > > Prohibiting actions which steal from other's > freedoms(stealing/killing) is entirely different than > endorsing/performing actions that steal from other's freedoms(married > people getting benefits that non-married pay a dis-proportionate share > for, i.e. taxes).
Hi Derek! The little boys just LOVE the pedophiles and voluntarily choose to be with them. No freedom is violated if the religiously motivated government would just stay out of the way. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
