=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe => => On Apr 11, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote: => => > And the difference between a clueless author and a => Microsoft manager => > would be ... => => A clueless author doesn't speak for Microsoft. A => Microsoft manager does. => => If the Visual Studio product manager says that VFP will => be put into open source, I would put much more weight on it => than some schlub with a blog. => => -- Ed Leafe
But did the VS product manager really say that in the proper context or did the clueless author just glom some words together? We discussed the possibilities of having core VFP source code opened up and the consensus here was that it is not likely. If you couple that with the rest of the quote (VFP customers would not trust a product not made by M$) (sorry, have to stop for a laugh) it sure looks like somebody's been nippin' again. But we shall see (like we have an alternative). B+ HALinNY _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
