On Friday, April 13, 2007 10:14 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > That brings up a point I've been discussing elsewhere. In your mind (and others on the list, natch), does >0.9 imply "almost ready" or "just before 1.0 is released"? Or does it mean that "this is the ninth point >release, and there could be dozens or hundreds more such point releases before we even *think* about a 1.0 >release" - e.g: >0.9, 0.10, 0.11, ... 0.232, 0.233...
We know that version numbers mean nothing. It should be an indication of where the product is in the life cycle. I would bet if the open source folks had to answer to share holders like MSFT and Apple did they would get out of 0.92 version. Right? David L. Crooks _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
