> Jim Felton wrote: > > While I would agree Foxbase was a command compatible clone of Dbase, It > was > > a much superior product. Much faster, more stable and multi platform, > > which Dbase tried but failed at. > > Why not Clipper? Object-oriented in DOS days , support ODBC-like drivers > called RDD, and lots of 3rd party libraries! The morons at Nantucket blew it when they came out with version 5 that wasn't backwards compatible -- and was buggy. That's "why not Clipper" and why I switched to FoxPro and have users still running code dating back to 1984. Scott
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
