<snip> You see, even if man's irresponsible behavior in polluting the planet is not responsible for global warming, why not pass laws that require good stewardship of the planet's environment. The cost of being good citizen of the planet is money well spent. <snip>
I can't argue with you there concerning stewardship. v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:16 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Global Warming Test Are you willing to bet the farm that the danger of global warming is a myth, and the current global warming of the planet will self correct itself at the end of the current warming cycle? I would rather take measure now that would act as a kind of insurance policy to ensure man is not responsible for the current accelerated global warming. After all, what is wrong with switching off fossil fuel to alternatives like wind, sun, biofuel, and thermal energy? What is wrong with requiring industry act responsible by cleaning up their pollution to the environment.? You see, even if man's irresponsible behavior in polluting the planet is not responsible for global warming, why not pass laws that require good stewardship of the planet's environment. The cost of being good citizen of the planet is money well spent. Regards, LelandJ Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > Wow, Leland you have taken the Global Warming Myth 'hook, line and > sinker' and no I don't have a PhD in a field of science; I only have a > masters in Physics and what I have seen so far from the Global Warming > crowd is very lack luster, very unconvincing. > > v/r > > > //SIGNED// > > Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF > 6th MDG Data Services Manager > 6th MDG Information System Security Officer > Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 1:25 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Global Warming Test > > Michael Madigan wrote: > >> That's completely not true. >> >> The vast number of METEOROLOGISTS DO NOT believe in >> man-made global warming. >> >> > Meteorologists report on the effects of global warming like sever > weather in the form of floods, hurricanes, drought, etc. They know > little or nothing about the cause of global warming, which in turn is a > cause directly related to increased sever weather. Also, Meteorologists > > have a very small local area of focus on which they report, rather than > a big picture study of warming a the global/World/Planet level. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > > >> This is a political movement, not a scientific >> movment. >> >> >> The same people who are against intelligence design as >> being junk science, believe in the junk science of >> man-made global warming. >> >> >> >> --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> The scientific argument about global warming is over >>> with the vast >>> majority of world scientists agreed global warming >>> has been accelerated >>> by CO2 pollution to the planet and is the number one >>> greatest threat to >>> humanity. All that is left now is the political >>> argument to be decided >>> in 2008. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> >>> Robert Calco wrote: >>> >>> >> http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/Q1.html >> >> >>>> There are 10 questions in all. >>>> >>>> - Bob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
