Derek,

We are keeping an eye on that and will buy their other tool as a show of
support. If it works, then we will port over to .NET for customers that
want it (for a fee) and they get the same application, just running in
.NET Other customers can stay as they are until M$ does something to
stop VFP running in Windows altogether. Then they will need to come over
to the Dabo App.

Our Dabo/Python app however will be a new product doing similar things
but in a better way. We would have brought out Version 2 in VFP (lots of
good code in our apps) which would have meant it would have been quicker
to get there.

We are not putting all our eggs (if any) into .NET as we may end up in
the same position in another 15 years time. I think that long term, Open
Source is the way to go. Then you know that your code is going to work
in 50 years time! If you've got the head for it, you can recompile the
runtimes to run in any OS and then have your app run on the runtime.




Robert


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Posted At: 19 April 2007 20:32
Posted To: Profox Archive
Conversation: [NF] NTBACKUP ERROR WIN 2003 SBS
Subject: Re: [NF] NTBACKUP ERROR WIN 2003 SBS


> To think the M$ asked me if my roadmap included re-writing everything 
> to take advantages of new features in new languages (i.e. .NET)! The 
> answer is NO, my apps and code work fine, Sell them, don't re-write 
> the whole bloody lot. Where is the business sense in that?
>
> Still, I think the move to DABO/Python will give us an advantage when 
> everyone moves over to Linux, specially in the business world where 
> they can save on licensing fees for their Oses.
>
> Doesn't this sound like another thread?

Seems like a tool that compiles VFP code into .NET code would provide
better ROI versus re-writing in DABO/Python...

http://www.etecnologia.net/products/VFPCompiler/VFPCompiler-index.htm

Hopefully they get it right. And then you can use it with Mono on
Linux...


--
Derek


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to