Please help me this problem: I want writing a program : Read string text in MSWORD --> convert string text to object picture (RTF) ---> reading to database *.dbf by Visual Foxpro
Example abcde (text) ---------> abcde (image, picture) ----------> inert into field (Gen) by VFP Thank you On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Send ProFox mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ProFox digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [OT] anyone ever used Virgin? (Michael Madigan) > 2. Re: [NF] Getting jump started - techniques... (Vince Teachout) > 3. Re: [OT] Looking for hope in all the wrong places (Robert Calco) > 4. Re: [NF] Getting jump started - techniques... > (Whil Hentzen (Pro*)) > 5. RE: [NF] Getting jump started - techniques... (john harvey) > 6. [OT] This is classic (Robert Calco) > 7. Re: [OT] This is classic (Helio W.) > 8. RE: [NF] Getting jump started - techniques... (Jeff Johnson) > 9. Re: [OT] This is classic (Michael Madigan) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:48:12 -0700 (PDT) > Subject: Re: [OT] anyone ever used Virgin? > There are those pre-paid phones too. > > > --- Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Everybody! > > > > I had to let my Verizon wireless phone service go > > when I closed my practice. > > Has anyone ever used Virgin? It looks like they are > > $20 every 90 days, which > > I could afford. I hardly ever called from my cell, > > or received a call, for > > that matter, I would not likely use up the > > admittedly limited airtime. > > > > > http://www.virginmobileusa.com/phones/phoneDetail.do?skuId=VM2125 > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Pete > > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Post Messages to: [email protected] > > Subscription Maintenance: > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > > OT-free version of this list: > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > > Searchable Archive: > > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > > This message: > > > > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > > are the opinions of the author, and do not > > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > > too stupid to see the obvious. > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:15:26 -0400 > Subject: Re: [NF] Getting jump started - techniques... > I don't have a lot of problems figuring out where I was or what I was > doing - usually reading the the code will do it, although it's hard to > understand (or, sometimes find) older code. > > My real problem is actually making myself sit down and start SOMETHING, > ANYTHING. > And usually reviewing the bills helps with that..... > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:53:06 -0400 > Subject: Re: [OT] Looking for hope in all the wrong places > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 April 2007 7:51 pm, Robert Calco wrote: > >> http://tinyurl.com/2484m4 > >> > >> Maybe we'll find intelligent life there. The supply on earth is > >> obviously running low, for example: > >> > >> http://tinyurl.com/2ah438 > > > > Hi Bob! > > > > What an a55hole! If Reid is P-woman's poodle maybe this guy is her > > chihuahua. > > Interesting that no other house member, not even the P-gal herself, > > stooped > > to such depth. > > There is no lack of colorful characters on the other side of the ... > (aisle seems to tame a term for the chasm...)... > > > > > Suppose he succeeded. > > Huh? Have you lost your mind, too? > > > With Cheney gone who picks the new vp? Nixon picked Ford > > in a similar situation, wonder who W would pick? Who could be > > confirmed by > > Congress? > > The only real faux pas Cheney made so far as VP was telling Leaky > Leahy to go f*ck himself within earshot of a microphone (I would > argue shooting the lawyer was a net positive, even if it was a > Republican friend ;-) ), and that was more restrained than what I > would have told that #(#$&@(#*$&@(#*$&@ after what Leahy said about > him on the floor of the Congress just hours prior to trying to chum > it up with him in a photo op. > > All other "transgressions" of his were legitimate policy differences > pursued with the vigor of a public servant who believes in what he's > doing (right or wrong), and I am so tired of people painting him as > an attack dog when in fact he's far more civil in his tone and > deference to facts than any of these sensationalist goof balls on the > Democrat side. They have all---from Schumer, to Rangel, to Leahy, to > Reid, to Pelosy, to Kerry, to Dean, to .... you name it... so crossed > the boundary of civil discourse going way back to 2003 that for them > to act like victims of a totalitarian regime is on its face an insult > to any intelligent person who has followed the "debate". Especially > since the only person who has gone to prison over disagreement about > a fact is Scooter Libby, and they now "have the power". Bush is > Hitler, yeah, right. > > If the media had any integrity they could have played a 5 minute > montage of all the Democrats (including Clinton, Kerry, Reid, etc.) > who warned us in no uncertain terms about Saddam's WMDs in 1998 and > during the debate over the war resolution in 2002 that all of these > hypocrites voted for right after showing Kucinich's retard-in-chief i- > wanna-be-a-contendah conference today. > > But the media has as much integrity as the current crop of > Republicans have testicles. > > Incidentally at the moment I plan to vote for Fred Thompson, whether > or not he runs. Gulianni and Romney excite me not at all based on all > I know about them right now, Gingrich is too full of himself and > frankly damaged goods, and I can't imagine any of the other players > making it on the national radar. > > I think it would be a good thing if Cheney stepped down for health > reasons and Bush at least had a chance to pick a VP who could run as > an incumbent. But Bush is too loyal to throw anyone of his people > under the bus for political reasons. > > On the other hand, maybe Washington will ultimately disabuse him of > blind loyalty to friends. It's gotten him apparently nowhere after > six years of routing Islamofascists on every front, including Iraq, > and bringing the stock market to an all-time high. > > I still cannot process how, on any level, we've supposedly "failed" > in Iraq. > > The supposedly civilized world has completely lost any sense of > historical perspective. > > Hell, even you Pete are speculating "What if Kucinich succeeds?" Have > you followed his career at all? I once shared an apartment with that > loser when I was a wee toddler in Cleveland. (He was running for dog > catcher or city councilman or something even then.) > > The only thing he ever achieved was being mayor of Cleveland when the > city went bankrupt and the Cuyahoga river erupted in flames. > > - Bob > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Pete > > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
