On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> I think that close enough to being a member of a well regulated
> Militia, even though I don't think the 2nd Amemdment to the
> Constitution
> hinges on the requirement of being a member of a well regulated
> Militia.
I guess that they just threw that clause in there for no reason,
then? What then is the purpose of the inclusion of the first clause
of the 2nd Amendment?
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
