This is what I've been saying
"This modelling approach assumes that CO2 levels drive temperature changes. However strong evidence exists to the contrary. De Freitas (2002) reports on a number of independent statistical analyses that conclude that the reverse is true, namely that temperature changes precede CO2 level changes, calling into question the basis of the modelling procedure." --- "Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.climatescience.org.nz/assets/20069271346160.GlobalWarmingLKW. > pdf > > http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/0 > 5-06-2004/0002168642&EDATE= > > What do you think? > > v/r > > > //SIGNED// > > Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF > 6th MDG Data Services Manager > 6th MDG Information System Security Officer > Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:35 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life > on Earth > > Its good to have you back Bob, and to see you > haven't lost a step while > away. You're fully up to speed already, and its > just your first week > back. > > I enjoyed listening to the link you provided, (eg I > never got the video > to work), about the previous Democratic > Administration's belief that > Saddam had WMD, and I couldn't help but chuckle a > little wondering if > you are still looking for them. > > Now you're tell me, and the Scientific community > form 113 countries > around the world, who just completed a 6 year study > of global warming > and climate change, that global warming is just a > figment of our > imagination, even though the esteem pannel of > Scientist have > statistically place a 90% probability that humans > are responsible for > global warming and climate change. > > I've learned that trying to reason with you on issue > you have made up > your mind about is like beating my head against a > brick wall. Trying to > > change people who are in denial is funny that way. > Welcome back, and I > look forward to some stimulating debates with you as > the 2008 elections > draw near. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > On 04/26/2007 Robert Calco wrote: > > Leland's capacity for ratiocination is startling > even for an > > accountant. I simply don't run into such high > quality specimens of > > non sequiturs and false inference, not to mention > absurdity, even in > > all the daily 'team meetings' I endure in IT > (there naturally the > > issue is quantity, not quality). > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
