Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I have never understood why we haven't yet developed a computer that could > write programs. > After all, with the exception of the language and the developer wanting to > put his/her personal touch on it, most software could easily be replaced by > black box type objects which a computer could put together much faster then > we can to make whatever program we asked it to build. >
Has been tried and failed. At univ. I was taught specification, which might be a previous step. But when you specify you also make mistakes, and it is harder to do. So what's the gain? > Virgil Bierschwale > Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate > (830) 329-6774 Cell > (830) 864-4799 Fax > (830) 864-4726 Home > http://www.bierschwale.com > http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com > http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OT] Realistic Robot > > Below is a link to a youtube video about robotics. From watching the > video, I get the feeling it will not be long before jobs are turned over > to robots, rather than shipped overseas. I wounder in what language the > robot is programmed? > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F759pkEl_xo > > http://hansonrobotics.com/ > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
