You can do the same exact thing using VMWare's products as well as Microsoft's virtual machine products..
It was the point I was trying to make in the 'denial' thread about keeping VFP apps running forever in a VM machine running on an "old" OS like XP, or as some have suggested 2000 (which is probably a better choice for the reasons they stated). At 10:21 AM 5/10/2007, you wrote: > >> If so, do you run VFP this way (I think not) ? If not, why not ? > > > > I do it all the time. I used to have a separate machine running Win2K TS, > > and use Microsoft Remote Desktop from my Mac to connect to the TS session > > on that server. > >That was my recollection. > > > What's cool now is that I'm working on a Python project that needs to run > > in Windows, but I much prefer to edit the code in BBEdit, a Mac text > > editor. So I set up the project folder on my Mac, and then configure the > > WinXP VM to share that folder. So I can edit the code in BBEdit, and then > > click on the adjoining WinXP window and test it. Click back, edit some > > more, click back, test, etc. > >That *is* cool. From a practical point of view, how many of the >guest OSs is it reasonable to have running concurrently ? > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
