Pete Theisen wrote: > On Tuesday 15 May 2007 2:53 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > <snip> >>> It is obvious that you are not taking the discussion seriously. Two posts >>> down you declare yourself to be God. >> 1 - It is in another thread. Have you ever heard about thread >> separation? Kind of different conversations. > > Hi Ricardo! > > This is a party conversation, the thread is the subject line. > >> 2 - Tell the Jesuits they should include irony in the theology >> curricula. It's a biiiiigg hole in your education. > > No It isn't. You communicate irony the same as non irony in your emails - > only > you knows it is irony. I don't think I would use irony in quite that way, > even if I were you. > > So you didn't really mean to blaspheme. Thank goodness for that.
Yes, I meant to blaspheme. You see, amongst those little things you mentioned that we are allowed to think as we wish I believe I have a deal with god. I don't pay attention to whatever he says or does, and he does the same with me. So you see, I'm allowed to blaspheme (according to Presbyterianism). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
