You're missing the point pete. If the attorney recused himself because their client admitted to them that they did it, then they deserve to go to jail
Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:52 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:43 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I understand. > BUT, do you want to see people go to jail because they can't afford the > attorney, OR because they're guilty. Hi Virgil! I am not qualified to say whether or not they are guilty - that is determined at their trial, what I observed was the lawyers' obscession with money. When there is legal aid, something that would be impossible if your outrageous proposal were adopted, they get a different attorney when the first one bails. Talk about prejudicing the case: "Your honor, I exercise my right to recuse myself from this case since the defendant is obviously soooo guilty". What if the defendant were you? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
