Rick Schummer wrote: >>> That's one vote for methodology #1.<< >>> > > I vote for methodology #1 for two reasons: > 1) you have more options to inform the user (or the tester) relative to what > did not go as expected > 2) Much simpler to debug than the one IF statement approach. > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. >
I vote similarly with the distinguished gentleman from the great state of Michigan as well, Mr. Original Poster, sir! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
