> You call for impeachment if the man is accused of improper behavior with a > subordinate employee on the job and in the workplace. But Bill is claiming > that "the gang" is guilty of "war crimes" - claiming this constantly, over > and over again.
It sounds like you're saying that sexual impropriety is worse than waging a war due to personal vendetta and profit motive? >This is treason BECAUSE it actively aids the enemy. You're making that claim solely on "if you're not for us, you're against us" mentality. That is flawed. I most certainly don't agree with everything Bill says, but what he's said in this case is far from treason, and is totally protected by our 1st Amendment, and I fully support his right to say it, even if you believe "it actively aids the enemy"... -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
