Ed Leafe wrote: > But perhaps a process akin to the Better Business Bureau, where > complaints about shoddy workmanship/practices are reviewed and made > public, might be a good first step.
While I'd agree with this, it's bound to be bullshit at times too where you get an asshole client who assassinates (or attempts to assassinate) your development/character because of something unreasonable (but something he thought reasonable) and because he's connected politically, the review board sides with him. All of this is a catch-22 scenario. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
