> Why do you continue to say that it doesn't work. > It does work and it works exactly the way it was designed too.
Why do you keep insisting you created this XML with the code you posted? You didn't. The code you posted was wrong. You obviously fixed it afterwards and are unaware that you posted old, non-working code, as Eyvind and I have pointed out. Also, once you get some data with special characters(or simply quotes), you'll find this code will break and no longer work. This is the reason parsers were created-- to make encoding and other xml grunt-work simpler for the client programmer. I'm sure you'll likely solve it with a replace() function call for each character you need to replace-- and while that may work, it's not a good design and screams 'hack'..... Again, I'm truly sorry you can't take constructive criticism and insist on taking it as a personal afront. I'll do my best to leave your posts alone in the future. Thanks. -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
