I think so. What people so often don't understand; size or quantity doesn't matter, its quality, sophistication, and the amount of power packed into the packages that counts, even in military terms. The army with the most people is less of a factor in who is going to win, than is the planning and fighting skills, motivation, logistics sophistication, and power of the weapon systems that determines the outcome, not the sheer number of military personnel.
Regards, LelandJ MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Well, here is a math problem for you. Given that GNP remain the same, >> but population in the U.S. declines, would that result in more GNP per >> preson or less. GNP per person? As population declines in relation to a >> constant amount of goods and services, then goods and services >> available per person increases, and the demand on the planet can also be >> reduced with a reduction in population. >> >> > > So in layman's or non-math-guru-speak, less people is a good thing, if I > understand you correctly. <g> > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
