Kevin Cully <> wrote:
> Okay. Who wrote to Ed at the Grip Line from this list?
>
> I disagree with this VFP developer.
>
> (1) VFP is still relevant and will be for years into the future
>From the school of Denial ;->
> (2) Linux and FOSS is a viable development platform and viable tools.
I don't consider the OS the development platform.
> (3) .NET is not a slam dunk choice as a development platform. I'm
> watching it with skepticism.
.NET is overwhelming in it's capabilities today and they are going to roll
out a more feature rich version later this year or early next.
> (4) Rewriting applications without
> in-depth analysis and obvious ROI is foolish.
Rewriting without the need for either new features or a management decision
to change "everything" is foolish. Sometimes a ROI is wasted time when some
pin head says "we are dropping the mainframe and going with SAP" God I love
those clients!
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown
http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/832 - Release Date: 6/4/2007 6:43
PM
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
