> >> Per MSFT, .NET 1.x series was revolutionary, so revolutionary that...it > >> isn't supported anymore.
> > Just like VFP. Well, depending on your definition of 'support' anyways... > But the backwards compatibility makes VFP really attractive!!! DotNot > can't say that apparently? VFP7, VFP8, and VFP9 all had things that were broken by default(SET ENGINEBEHAVIOR, etc.). .NET 1.x->2.x are similar things. The core language didn't change-- some obscure things did, and new features were added to 2.x, etc. I'm not 100% familiar, but I did look at the differences and all I could find was obscure things that were in 1.x and not 2.x... -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
