On Jun 10, 2007, at 7:59 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
wrote:
> I think I could vote for Richardson, and definitely for Lieberman,
> as he
> doesn't seem like a panzie.
Oh, I see. Someone who plunges us recklessly into another war of
choice is to be admired for not being a pansy? By your logic, someone
who thinks that it is better not to get entangled in a hopeless
quagmire is a pansy?
> What do you think their chances are of
> teaming up for a winning combination?
Richardson has a lot to like, but Lieberman has got to go.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
