Michael Madigan wrote: > If the idea is to lower the amount of polution in NYC, > then yes, NYC should pay for it with a tax credit. > > There are so many easy ways to lower the "carbon > footprint" of NYC that doesn't involve breaking the > backs of the cab driver. > > Why not replace all the lights in NYC with some low > watt bulbs? Why not give away compact florescent > bulbs to residents of Manhattan? Why not give tax > incentives to businesses that work the graveyard > shift? >
While your last idea is understandable, I'd hate to be the poor bastard who has to work that graveyard shift just because his employer wants the tax credit. As for light bulbs, that's a good idea, and I know that the grocery stores around here have HAD to replace their lights recently due to some state (or federal?) mandate so that they're consuming less energy. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
