A workaround is susceptible to debugging? :-)
Paul Newton wrote: > Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: > >> On Jun 14, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Frank Burcaw wrote: >> >> >> >>> It works pretty good, but I realized that the user could enter a >>> comma before the word INC, LLC, CORP etc, like "ROBERT JONES, LLC". >>> >>> >> Just a workaround, but why don't you take the comma out of the string >> when it contains "INC, LLC, CORP etc," before you process it with >> your regex statement? >> >> > > That reminds me ... what is the difference between a workaround and a > kludge ? > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
