Having worked for the Army on and off for 20 years, I betcha the problems lie with the retarded civil servants in charge of the development.
I've worked with SAIC engineers over the years and they all seemed to be very competent. I'm also willing to bet creeping functionality brought down the whole project. --- Jerry Wolper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The FBI uses the same contractors that write > highly > > sophisticated military software, so capability is > not > > an issue. > > Not very well... > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2006/08/17/AR2006081701485_pf.html > > or > > http://tinyurl.com/r9hjr > > -Jerry Wolper > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
