On 6/22/07, Michael Hawksworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ADA is a great language that was killed by the level of documentation you > had to do for the ESA/NASA/MOD/DOD... how many projects have you worked on > that you needed to formally prove using 'Z'. Talk about test driven > development.
I remember programming in ADA at college. ADA has multi tasking built into the language. We used a DOS-based compiler (interpreter?). Multi-tasking was a problem with DOS of course, so you had to insert wait(0) calls into the code at various points to get it working correctly. I remember ADA being a PITA. Too strict a language (and I *like* strongly-types languages). -- Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
