Then we could have [OT SEX] Mind you I prefer underneath as opposed to On Top!
Dave Crozier -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: 25 June 2007 10:10 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NF] Graphic editing/ creation software Allen Pollard wrote: > So be it. :) > Then we could get rid of [OT] and just have {SEX] ! > Allen > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Alan Bourke > Sent: 25 June 2007 10:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Graphic editing/ creation software > > Allen Pollard wrote: > >> I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be too much based on American >> politics which seems to forget there are others from the rest of the world >> here not interested in that subject. If [OT] could steer clear of >> > politics, > >> war and religion I would have kept it. >> > > That just leaves sex. > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 24/06/2007 > 08:33 > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
