Michael,

I don't think there are any hard and fast rules on this. Here are 2 examples
of existing projects for your consideration.

Project 1 - 3 major rewrites 

First iteration in MS-Basic 1980-1983 800 person hours

Second iteration in VFP5 - 6 months duration - over 600 person hours.

Third iteration - 6 months in 2007 duration in VFP 9 - 170 person hours plus

28 tables in one database
63 stored procedures
42 views
17 classes
80 screens
35 reports
5 labels
23 programs
1 menu
90 bitmaps

Project 2 in VFP 6, 7 & 9 between 2002-2007 - 3700 person hours plus

72 tables in on database
34 views
8 free tables
81 screens
61 reports
16 classes
8 programs
6 menus
12 text (.h) files
150 bitmaps

There are other examples - some simpler and some more complex

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bidding for jobs based upon the number of tables involved

Did any of you ever come up with a bid where the number tables in the 
database helped you form the idea of how many screens it'd take to 
support such a database?  I've scoped out the database entities and 
their attributes for a job MBSS is bidding on and am now working to 
derive a price. 

Sure wish I was an expert at FPA (Function Point Analysis)!!  Then 
there'd at least be a (somewhat) consistent formula!  <g>

(This is a VFP9 app against a MySQL backend).

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to