Ted Roche wrote: > On 7/5/07, Alan Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't have anything premade. This could get to be pretty > computationally intensive for a lot of rows. > > Yep! Max of 20 maybe so get out your combinatorial maths textbooks!
> Bad pseudocode follows: > Thanks. I found some C++ code as well that I might try and port. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
