On Friday 13 July 2007 13:37, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: <snip>
> However, you are making a grand assumption that he is a "developer." > Upon seeing "ProFox" or "FoxPro," he could have assumed that we were > "smooth operators" in the "foxes" department. Thus highly motivated, > he worked through the labyrinthine process to subscribe. In the haze > of disappointment upon realizing that our discussions were more > mundane, his comprehension may have abated. Hi Ken! Oh, I never thought of that. Of course. Pity indeed. > We should pity him, really. > Ken (stealing away before the [OT] police strike) -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
