Grigore Dolghin wrote: > So... it IS a bug, right? > Maybe, maybe not - if you think about it, it's really the CDX that has to have "EXCLUSIVE" rather than the table, even though you can't have exclusive rights to the CDX without opening/using the table exlusively
Paul Newton > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:49 PM > Subject: Re: Bug in VFP SP1? > > > >> At 2007-07-18 13:43, you wrote: >> >>> Hey guys. The following code should raise error 110 (File must be >>> opened exclusively). However, it doesn't. Run the thing, then >>> comment the CREATE part, restart vfp and run it again. It does raise the >>> error. >>> >> For some reason (in all versions of VFP) - If there is no index-file >> you CAN index how much you want without exclusive rights, but the >> second time you try it there WILL be an index-file and VFP responds >> correctly. >> >> >>> Is this a bug or what??? :) >>> >>> Create Table MyDBF ( ; >>> Id I, ; >>> Nume C(10), ; >>> Prenume C(10)) >>> >>> Close Tables All >>> Use MyDBF Shared >>> Index On Id Tag Id >>> >> ****************************** >> * Dan Olsson >> * <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * <http://www.dolittle.se> >> >> >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
