On Friday 20 July 2007 23:53, Graham Dobson wrote: > > Yeah, right, if they *can*. But what if they can't? And how many can? >> Looking at it another way, why should they? Family, tradition, home, >>friends - all are secondary to the f***ing billionaires getting more >>billions at the expense of the poor or "becoming poor"? > > At least all of them are free to do what they can. Not told to do what > they must. You go on about the poor, but the reality is that most people > in America are moderately well off.
Hi Graham! Actually, that depends on where you are. In the South, generally, and the so-called "right-to-work" states, workers have remarkably few options. "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss". The empires you mentioned no longer benefit the middle, only the rich. Work for them, you get a pittance unless you are in the top 10 or less. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
