You could live quite comfortably around there for that $100K + per year...

You couldn't buy a house there but then, nobody else can around there 
either except the filthy rich...


Jeff Johnson wrote:
> I am quite familiar with this area and it is probably the most expensive
> place in the US to live.  If it's not, it's got to be in the top 5.
> Peoplesoft and a lot of huge software companies are there and $55 would not
> be acceptable for someone that lives there.  A three bedroom tract home
> would cost you over $350k.
>
> That's just my take on it based on experience.
>
> Jeff
>
> Jeff Johnson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 623-582-0323
> Fax 623-869-0675
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Chet Gardiner
>> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 10:40 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [GIG] Pleasanton, California
>>
>> I've interviewed there.  It's a legit offer.  The rate depends on
>> experience.  I was at the $55 level...
>>
>> They did seem a little disorganized -- in the busy way -- too much to do
>> and too little time.  This was about 3 years ago...
>>
>> It'd probably be a pretty good gig for someone with experience who
>> either lives close or doesn't mind commuting.
>>
>>
>> William Sanders / EFG wrote:
>>     
>>> Rate seems weird, and its part-time
>>> http://www.guardian-computer.com/employment/Programer-Foxpro-Senior.html
>>>
>>> Mondo Regards [Bill]
>>>
>>>       
>>     
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to