Matt Jarvis wrote: >We use Hylafax,
<snip> >I've been disappointed with our choice of the client for the user >desktop, but that doesn't have anything to do w/ Hylafax. We're using >something called WHFC ... Ted Roche wrote: http://winprinthylafax.sourceforge.net/ Neither of these, nor the several others listed at http://www.hylafax.org/content/Client_Software can acquire images from scanners. I think this may be the biggest sticking point. The people who work here can barely use the system we have now, which has the ability to acquire scanned images right from the fax client. Making them use two different systems--one to scan and doctor text images, and one to manage fax traffic--simply will not be possible. Why is it that virtually nobody thinks--"Hey, I'll make a computer fax system! What's a fax machine? It's a machine that scans documents and sends them over the phone. Therefore, when I create a fax system I should include the ability to scan documents." WinFax thought this. Zetafax thought this. What's wrong with everybody else? Ken Dibble www.stic-cil.org _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
