I believe that is correct, I read that somewhere, hence my gingerly approaching the RD vs TS lingo. It is mostly regular End Users that are impacted (and those of us that sell a client on the use of 2003 Server counting on TS to get around bandwidth or ther (security) issues. It sets up fine, and in 6 months, WHAM! No more use until you license it (Oh, by the way). Makes one feel kind of trapped like a rat, yes?
Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Kaye > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Terminal services problem > > > AFAIK you can still have 2 admin sessions in W2003. > > Ted Roche wrote: > > Ow! So, remote administrative support (not fo running apps remotely, > > which is TS and might require a license, but for maintaining the > > server) you have to shell out $750 for a TS license? What a ripoff. > > > > -- > Richard Kaye > Vice President > Artfact/RFC Systems > Voice: 617.219.1038 > Fax: 617.219.1001 > > For the fastest response time, please send your support > queries to: > > Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message has been checked for viruses before sending. > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
