If I setup a linux box with and put SSL on it. Using a dynamic dns, I use
Putty to connect and port forward my http protocols, and a few others. 

Does this create more problems than it is worth?
Is this seen as more secure way of using hot spot wi-fi connections?

Tracy

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:14 AM

On 8/3/07, Tracy Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/08/02/public_wifi_hack/
>
>
> Excerpt:
> "If I sniff your Gmail connection and get all your cookies and attach 
> them to my Gmail, I now become you, I clone you," Graham said during a 
> presentation on Thursday. "Web 2.0 is now fundamentally broken."
>

The other excerpt:

"Now we know better. Any session that isn't protected from start to finish
by SSL is vulnerable to the hack. And because session IDs generated by most
sites are valid for an indefinite period, that means intruders could
silently access our accounts for years - even if we regularly change our
passwords."

This has nothing to do with Web 2.0 (whatever that is), Javascript, AJAX or
any of the other WebTwoOh-ish stuff. This is basic https:
secure hypertext transport protocol. If you're not using https, if you don't
see the padlock in the browser, what you are doing is not secure.

SSL is more processor- and power-intensive than non-encrypted sessions.
Session cookie hijacking has always been a problem.

But thanks for the reminder.

-- 

Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to