On 8/7/07, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 August 2007 02:49, Jean Laeremans wrote: > > On 8/7/07, kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You need an adverb there. I suggest 'surely' instead of 'sure' > > > > It was just a lame effort of mine to write colonial English... > > Hi Jean! > > Your usage is more often seen than his. I would say that there is not one in a > hundred who know how to say it correctly, and he is that one. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://www.pete-theisen.com/
Well, he's right. Funny thing is i did it on purpose ...fortunately my old (Oxford) English teacher isn't among(st) the living anymore. A+ jml _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
